celebrity writers

Dogs in Laboratory Research

Refining, Reducing, and Replacing Lab Animal Testing

Jun 15, 2007

Dogs, mainly Beagles, endure distressful tests and painful surgical mutilation for medical and cosmetic research which may be irrevelant to humans.

Dogs are our own beloved companion pets but, over the years, they have suffered much pain and distress in the name of research. Dogs have been used to study maternal deprivation, the effects of smoking, chemical toxicity, and the effectiveness of medical devices. Laboratory dogs have endured surgical mutilation and distressful tests for research in organ transplants, trauma and shock training, diabetes, chemotherapy, cardiovascular diseases, pharmacological trials, dental care, cosmetics and many other subjects. They are not even allowed pain relief if it interferes with the nature of the test.

Some research dogs are bred specifically for research purposes and others are strays or ex-pets from shelters. However, some states have made it illegal for shelters to sell dogs to dealers for research labs. Although all breeds and mixes are used, Beagles are the most popular test dogs because of their size and docile temperament. Photos of Beagles and other dogs, just like yours and mine, being used in research can be found on the Internet. These photos are extremely graphic and disturbing. Please browse at your own risk.

The US Pet Ownership and Demographics Sourcebook claims there are more than 60 million pet dogs living as members of households. Humans form strong bonds with their dogs and, as the public becomes more aware of the suffering of lab dogs and other animals, questions of morality, as well as accuracy and consumer safety, have arisen. Dog owners, and other concerned citizens, are putting pressure on researchers to find alternatives to animal testing.

According to the FDA, 92% of drugs that pass animal trials fail during human clinical trials. In February 2006, six men became deathly ill and fell into comas while participating in tests of a new therapeutic antibody which had passed animal trials. Animal testing can never completely reflect the human condition. In the last 20 years, the search for alternatives has escalated and barbaric methods are gradually being replaced by more accurate and cost-effective methods such as computer models, cell cultures, and human studies.

Some veterinary schools have stopped using lab animals and have implemented programs for students to learn by providing treatments and surgeries for shelter dogs and cats who would otherwise lack medical care.

The use of dogs and other animals in laboratories has been in decline since the 70’s. Concerned citizens can learn as much as possible about alternatives to animal testing and make a point to educate others. They can patronize companies that support alternatives as well as contact elected officials and urge them to support the development and implementation of more alternative tests. Students or those who know a student can urge the use of computer models instead of lab animal dissection. Education and dedication are key in refining, reducing, and replacing animal testing. Precious belongs in your lap, not wired to a lab table.

The copyright of the article Dogs in Laboratory Research in Dogs is owned by Joy Butler. Permission to republish Dogs in Laboratory Research in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Comments

Jun 16, 2007 6:29 PM

Charla Dawson :

Those are disturbing images.
I don't necessarily agree with animal research but I have spoken to researchers at veterinary conferences, one a cancer scientist in Seattle, I learned that actual medical research can only be done with animals that have been bred at the facility. Animals that are from shelters or the streets can not be used because there are to many variables, they have to have a control animal.
I realize that this doesn't make it less cruel but my point is that laboratories that use shelter animals are not reputable and can not possibly be doing medical experiments that will have any real benefit because there will be too many variables involved in the experiment. For example, if the smoking dogs came from a shelter we won't know if there lung cancer is from smoking the cigarettes themselves or from a previous owner who smoked a pack a day.
I'm not defending animal research but a lot of good has come from reputable researches. Diabetics wouldn't have insulin if it weren't for animal research.

Jun 16, 2007 11:14 PM

Joy Butler :

A lot of good, a lot of bad, I'm not sure it equals out, especially where vanity and vices are concerned. But even in medical research, animal testing can not reliably reflect the human condition and there are alternatives being developed that are more reliable, more humane, and more cost effective.

Oct 21, 2008 6:30 PM

Guest :

It does not make a difference whether or not there are benifets. It comes down to one simple principle. We, as humans, in no way have the right to torture other living things for our selfish reasons. My father has diabetes so I'm not naive to the factors.

3 Comments